Pharma & Biotech
Speed up content sign-off while your reviewers stay in control. Built for commercial, medical affairs and medical communications teams at pharma and biotech companies.
Sign-off is the slow part
Your team can make content with AI now, but every piece still goes through medical, legal and regulatory review. A reviewer has to put their name on it, and the draft waits while someone gathers comments from email, meetings and the review portal.
The AI budget is approved too, and the plan was to spend it on hiring engineers. Those hires are slow, and the CFO already wants to know what the money has bought.

Faster sign-off, same reviewers.
- Review queues with named reviewers
- Field insights captured after every visit
What we fix
We start with the handoffs around review and research.
- Copying between systems. Staff move the same claims, references and comments by hand between documents, the review portal and the CRM. Our automation work connects them, so each detail is entered once.
- Review that runs on chasing. Drafts wait while someone pulls comments from email and meetings into one version, then chases the next approval. Our human-in-the-loop work puts each draft in a queue with a named reviewer and a due date, so nobody has to chase it.
- Field insights that get lost. MSLs hear what doctors need every day, and most of it stays buried in CRM notes. Short voice debriefs through our discovery work capture those insights, so medical and commercial teams can act on them.


What changes for your team
Content reaches doctors sooner. With review queues, approval logs and named reviewers in the workflow, reviewers spend their time on the calls only they can make, and less of the work goes out to agencies.
Medical and commercial teams see what MSLs hear from doctors each week, in one place. Today that insight sits in CRM notes until someone reads them, often months later.
The CFO sees exactly what the AI budget paid for. We write two or three success measures with you in the first week, and you see numbers from before and after when the first workflow goes live.
What we did for Dermsquared
Dermsquared is a medical education company that runs the kind of conferences pharma companies sponsor. We built its app and the platform behind it, and Dermsquared owns the code and the data.
Your work looks different, but we'd start the same way: building it into your own tools so your team owns it. There's more in the Dermsquared case study.
What these teams ask us
Our review process won't let an outside team near our content.
That review stays. We build it into the workflow with review queues, approval logs and named reviewers. Your reviewers still sign off on every piece, and they spend less time chasing it.
What about clinical risk?
Your reviewers keep every decision, and we don't make clinical or diagnostic claims. A named person signs each piece, and the log shows who signed and when.
Why not hire our own engineers?
Hire. We'll ship while you do, and your new team takes over code it owns, with tests and a written record of each decision.
We'd love to chat.
Bring what's slow, rented or stuck. You'll leave with what we'd build first and how long it takes.
Book a call